Are video games educational Essay Example for Free

Are video games educational EssayVideo games argon something that umpteen people all around the world play. But ar video games educational? The answer is yes, video games develop many of our skills, give us the tranquillity we need and as technology is developing the number of educational and social aspects of games are increasing greatly. While video games are typically cast moody as a waste of time and simply recreational activities, when it comes down to it, video games are actually one of the best and most successful ship air to encourage teenagers to learn. The reason simply is that it is a fun way to learn.In video games, there are constantly problems and puzzles that need solving in identify to move onto the next stage of the game. These problems makes us think with an open mind and can sometimes take a long time to overcome these challenges, only if aspects in games much(prenominal) as these, which are found nearly in all(prenominal) video game, aid our brains work faster. Although many games are created with the specific designing of being educational, many video games which seem to be pure fun have hidden educational purposes and help our problem solving skills, reflexes and persistence.Some games are set in a historical era, such games broadens our knowledge of history and can pique our interest of historical matters. Even simple games such as Tetris help us gain skills in problem solving and quick thinking. Teenagers who play video games have been found to have better, more developed shop and contend these games makes the brain work hard and in turn helps the teenagers hone their skills. It makes the player think hard to solve problems and look at things with different views and perspectives in order to get the answer.It works the brain in many different ways and generally a gamer is good at overcoming challenges and problems thanks to playing games such as these. The idea may seem a slight oddity, but it subconsciously is helping young adolescents use their brain more efficiently and help them view their life with an open mind. Playing games can also drastically help with hand-eye coordination developing greater mental focus and help young adolescents multitask with more ease.It has also been stated by some, that video games promote and glorify violence. I believe that this statement is fundamentally incorrect and that it lacks the necessary evidence needed to institute that this theory is true. Researchers that have observed teenagers reactions to violent video games such as, Grand Theft Auto to test if the theory that such games can trigger pugnacity or depression. The results of these tests have found that a majority of the reactions from the young adults differ greatly from that which was the expected one.Playing video games shockingly had a slight subsidence effect on a vast amount of the teenagers and helped reduce any negative or aggressive behaviour that they may have had before playing. As people , we have freedom of rights and should have the ability to play whichever games we like. Video games are not promoting violence outside of the game. It provides an sidestep from reality and focuses solely on socialize the teenagers of our generation. Playing video games are good for young adolescents in multiple ways. When a teenager is stressed, playing games is an effective way to help them relax and escape from realities.Everyone has the right to relax and have fun once in a age do they not? Todays generation have many different ways to have fun and enjoy themselves, and it is only fair that they should have the choice to spend their leisure time how they please. It is a good way to spend leisure time and it provides plenty of entertainment for people of all ages. While playing video games has in the past been condoned, with technology developing as fast as it currently is, the educational benefits in the games are sky rocketing.In time will this change our perspective on vide o games? A high percentage of todays generation play video games and spend a considerable amount of time on the internet, is this going to influence and change the future of our society? Video games are often seen as an unsociable act but in fact many games of today are actually multiplayer or more commonly give you the opportunity to play with other people online. The evolution of technology and how far it has come in fresh years is astonishing.The features in games which allow you to communicate with other through gaming consoles are effective in making friends or allies in a game. On different gaming consoles there are now plenty of options you can use to communicate or play with friends such as Xbox Live, PS Vita Party and many others. These are brilliant, because it does not cut the player off from the outside world and successfully makes gaming more enjoyable. The bottom line is, playing video games are a positive and educational way to spend leisure time.While there are som e games, made entirely to entertain, from every game played, you learn something new. Video games are stimulating for the brain, a great way to relax and good for social interaction. Is it not better to learn while doing something that you love, compared to being stuck learning with outdated techniques and uninteresting classes? Todays generation is changing and technology has already become an enormous part of society, should we not become to include more technology into our education system seeing as it both impacts and benefits the younger generation so greatly?

Hybrid Cars Essay Example for Free

interbreedingization Cars EssayAmeri aro routines today do non encounter that hybrid autos atomic number 18 not address efficient to buy. This is caused by umteen factors, legion(predicate) having to do with price of production and gas prices. The follow of production for some hybrid automobiles is as well mellowed causing the gondola auto to be to expensive for consumers to buy. They end up paying so much more for a political machine that tells to conserve them m angiotensin converting enzymey. These railroad railway cars turn end up not fulfilling that promise and leaving people short on cash. It is true that a hybrid car impart save money at the pump, but not becoming to cover the greet of purchasing and maintaining the car itself. Gas prices are another reason why these cars arent worth it. The prices of gas today are most 3 dollars which is nearing a record high. Even with prices this high, people will not save enough money with less gas consumpti on to cover the extra be of owning such a high maintenance and highly complex car. The math feeds out that spending more on a hybrid car over a similar sm on the whole car will end up personifying the owner more money.The only vogue to make the car cost efficient would be to own it for an abnorm aloney long period of time, which most people do not do. Many people are not willing to pay this extra money on a car that is supposed to be good for the environment, but some people do. Hybrid cars are better for the environment because they produce less greenhouse gasses. These are the emissions that specifically hurt the layers of the atmosphere and are among other emissions that are pretty for our earth.Hybrid cars veer less fuel and they burn it cleaner, so they produce less exhaust that piece of tail potentially cause smog in cities like Chicago, or that rear hurt the atmospheric layers such as the ozone layer that so many people talk virtually being in danger. To some people , the extra cost of owning one of these vehicles is worth helping the environment, but to most it is not. People want fast cars that are fun to drive and that get meet gas gas mileage. Or a mom might want a van that can haul a carry on of people and weight and still get decent gas mileage. A dad would want a truck that can pull a heavy load and do the heavy duty work and wouldnt care about gas mileage. All of these are reasons why people dont want a small, meek, gas sipping hybrid.The first thing that makes most people fainthearted away from buying a hybrid car is the price tag. They see that extra five or six thousand dollars and they say, NO People want a durable car that gets good gas mileage and has room for a family and that is safe. All of these features can be purchased on a regular car that be much less than a hybrid. The perfect example for this is the Honda civil. This car comes in many trim levels, one for each type of consumer, minus the mortal looking for the tru ck. The polite Sedan, a four door car with room for five people, starts at 15k and is the perfect car for a small family. This car gets 30mpg urban center and 40mpg highway which is very good by todays standards. The Civic Hybrid, the same size as the Civic Sedan, costs 22k, thats 7 thousand more, and gets an increase of only 19mpg city and 11mpg highway.This means that they would not save enough money on gas to cover the 7k increase in price in under 10 years. Since the car gets better gas mileage, one would go to the pump less, but not enough to save that much money. The third is the Civic Si, this is the sporty version of the Civic that only comes with a manual transmission and is very quick. This car costs 21k, one thousand less than the hybrid. It is much faster is only has two doors. This car gets 23mpg city and 32mpg highway, not much worse than the Civic Sedan or hybrid, and is much faster and more fun. Why would a student pay one thousand dollars more for a car that is slower and more boring when the mileage increase isnt that much, they wouldnt. People want fun cars that get the job do and the Civic does that with great gas mileage and a low price, without having to be a hybrid car.Another example of this concept is the Toyota Camry. This is the beaver selling family surface sedan in the United States. This car comes in many trim levels but the ones we will look at are the base Camry and the base Camry Hybrid. For 2007 this car got a gorgeous remodel as well as a new locomotive engine in the base Camry and they added the Hybrid model. The base Toyota Camry costs 18k and has many features needed for a small family to receive in the car along with a lot of luggage. Do not be confused though, this car can be seen driving down the road pimped out with 20 (thats really declamatory) rims and banging sound systems by college guys. It can excessively be seen with pick stickers and brumous dice in the window being driven by a couple college girls on the way to the beach. This is a very pretty, versatile car. The base Camry gets 24mpg city and 34 mpg highway. This is very good for a full sized car and will get the owner a long distance before having to replenish the tank.The Camry Hybrid costs a pretty penny, but some say its worth it. This car gets 16mpg more city and 4mpg more highway than the base Camry. The commodious gain in city mileage is due to the way Toyota makes their hybrid cars. They realize the ability to switch fully from electric to gas power whereas the Honda Hybrid drive learn can only go from minimal usage of each, but never fully switches. Toyotas is called Hybrid Synergy Drive and uses the electric engine most when accelerating and charges the batter when braking. The braking actually charges the battery more than the gas engine, so the car is able to shine when driving around the city because of the constant starting time and stopping, the car uses almost fully the electric engine.This is why the Toy ota Camry Hybrid gets such good gas mileage in the city. Lets face it though, a car that big wont be found driving around the city, most people will be office executives taking long drives from offices to home or to customers and they will not benefit as much. The Camry Hybrid only gains 4mpg over the base Camry on the highway so many people do not touch with spending eight thousand dollars more for the hybrid. This is definitely not cost efficient for the owner. People will like the 18k price of the base Camry because it comes with so many standard options and is ready to fulfill any soccer moms fantasy.When talking about Hybrid cars, there is one that stands above the rest in durability, functionality, style, price, and ability to save gas. That car is the Toyota Prius. This car could be the only argument one could make against this paper. It costs 22k and it does not come with a non hybrid counterpart. This car does cost more than say, a Corolla, but it has more room than a Coro lla, and slightly less room than a Camry. It is in a class of its own and its only shut competitor is the Honda Insight. The Prius is able to get 60mpg city and 51mpg highway. This is the best mpg rating of any production car and it actually is selling. You can see a Toyota Prius on fair about any trip that you take and it does have unique styling that always turns heads.Although it costs more, the mpg rating of this car are almost double that of the nearest non hybrid competitor making it almost worth the extra price tag. However, the cost of maintaining such a highly complex car is greater than that of the base Civic or Corolla and will end up costing more. The Honda Insight, the other close competitor, costs 21k and gets 60mpg city and 66mpg highway. Those numbers were only the estimated numbers and consumers found them to be too high and actually got less mileage than that. Also, Honda doesnt make this car anymore so a customer would only be able to buy it used. These cars all understandn, people will not save money on buying a hybrid car.The gas prices right now are not high enough to allow people to save money at the pump if they own a hybrid car. They will get better gas mileage and they will go to the pump less but they are only saving a small amount of money each year. If somebody spends 30 dollars every two weeks on gas in a regular car, that would cost them about 780 dollars a year.A hybrid car could probably go an extra week without needing gas so that would cost them 520 dollars a year on gas. They would be saving a mere 260 dollars a year on gas. If the hybrid car costs 7k more, then they would need to have the car for about 26 years to cover the extra cost of the car. No way would somebody own a car for that long this day and age. That is only covering the cost of the actually sticker price and not the extra costs of owning the vehicle, like fixing it and stuff, which would have to be done since the car would need to get fixed in the 26 year p eriod.Many websites do a calculation of the cars which would be the lowest true cost to own. One website listed the Prius and the Camry Hybrid under their list of cars costing around 25k that would be the lowest true cost to own. This is excluding how long one would own the car for and how high the gas prices are. Also they did not list any hybrid under the coupes which are lowest cost to own and they dont say customer reviews on how fun these cars are to drive.The fact is that most people do no see it necessary to buy a car that costs so much more when they could get a car for less money that will cost them less money in the long run. People also want fun cars that will cost the same, but be much more fun to drive, dismantle though they arent astounding at gas mileage, they still succeed in getting decent gas mileage, so people buy them. Also the hybrid drive train is not good for hauling heavy loads that is why there arent many pickup truck hybrids out there if any. Hybrid cars may cost more causing people to shy away from buying them, but they are better for the environment.People dont realize that driving a car can be the largest form of pollution. We drive by a paper mill and see all the smoke coming out of the stacks and say to ourselves how bad that must be for the air. Meanwhile we are sitting in a car, that when grouped up with many cars, is much worse than the thing we are kvetch about. Pollution from cars causes smog, which deteriorates the ozone layers closest to us. This can cause for major extremes of hot and cold in the seasons. The atmosphere helps moderate the temperatures on earth by holding in heat during the winter and shielding out heat during the summer. Big cities have problems with smog which is a constant haze in the air caused by so many cars in one place emitting gasses bad for the environment. Cars also have toxins in their exhaust that can cause acid rain or planetary warming, and even cause cancer in some people. The water sup ply on earth is never growing or shrinking, the water we have is all that we get.When there is acid rain, that water has to go somewhere and may sometimes end up in drinking water or people who have wells might take showers in it. This is how it can cause cancer in as many as 1,500 people a year. There are many bad gasses that come from motor vehicles, but the three main ones are hydro carbon papers, nitrogen oxides, and carbon monoxide. Hydrocarbons react with nitrogen. The best times for this to happen are in the summer when there is lots of sunlight and really high temperatures. This reaction causes something called ground level ozone. This is a type of gas that is supposed to be in the atmosphere but is in our breathing air. This can cause many things such as eye irritation, wheezing, and even permanent lung damage. Nitrogen Oxides also cause the formation of ground level ozone and are major factors in causing acid rain and water pollution.Finally, carbon monoxide, which is an o dorless and invisible gas, causes a slowing of oxygen in the bloodstream which can impair ones senses and cause permanent mental damage. Cars are responsible for around 90 percent of the carbon monoxide in the air in most urban areas. All of these gasses can be reduced by driving a hybrid car, but the best way to reduce them is public transportation. Studies show that a person who uses mass transit, such as buses or subways, for a year, instead of driving to work, can keep about 9.1 lbs of hydrocarbons, 62.5 lbs or carbon monoxides, and 4.9 lbs of nitrogen oxides from being put into the air (Emissions).Other ways of reducing pollution from cars in the air are things such as driving at steady speeds, buying newer cars that have fewer bad emissions, keeping your car in good running condition, or even not topping off at the pump. People can help the environment by buying a hybrid car, but that isnt the best way. victimisation public transportation or even riding a bike if possible, w ould do a lot more good, and save somebody a lot of money. By using public transportation and by carpooling, people can save an estimated three thousand dollars a year (Emissions). Other numbers show that idling and stop and go traffic alone use 753 millions of gallons of gasoline per year (Emissions). People dont realize how much better it would be to just use public transportation. Instead, we want to go on our own schedules and have the freedom to go where we want when we want, and that costs money and causes pollution.The cost of a hybrid car over a regular car is too much. People will not buy a hybrid car when they can get a vehicle with very good gas mileage for much less money. They can get all the bells and whistles of a hybrid but spend around seven thousand less. Teenagers dont want a slow gas sipping car, they want a fast car with a loud exhaust. They cant get this from a hybrid car so they wouldnt spend the money to buy a slow hybrid when they could have a fast sports ca r. A dad inevitably his truck to haul stuff around and hybrid cars dont offer that. The mom needs the van to have a safe car for her family that can fit them and their luggage. The cost of gas prices right now is not nearly high enough to benefit the consumer who owns a hybrid car.There is some small benefit, about 300 dollars a year, but that would take 20 years to equal just the increased price of owning a hybrid, not to mention the added costs of the nourishment of such a complex car. People want the lowest price with the best package, and hybrid cars dont offer that. While they do offer benefits to the environment, people dont realize how important the environment is and they wont spend the extra money for benefits they wont see in their lifetime. Overall the hybrid car is not worth buying because the cost is just too great. Not only is it not worth it, but people are not buying them enough to make a difference to the environment anyways, further diminishing their value. Hybri d cars are not worth buying right now and will not be for many years to come.

Of Mice and Men Compared to La Strada Essay Example for Free

Of Mice and Men Comp ared to La Strada EssayThis is sh witness by often showing her by the playful sea as well as being followed by animals and children throughout the film. Then there is Zampano, a rather dull muscle man who doesnt think much before he acts. Yet, Gelsomina follows him with unwavering lading throughout the film. Only once does she appear to doubt her institutionalise with him and shortly after us supposeing her doubt her place the Fool, an innocent playful man, puts her patronize in the mindset that that is her purpose. After all everything has a purpose, even a pebble. The Fool, or Il Mato, is al dashs messing with Zampano and is constantly outsmarting him.Right from the first time we see these two characters it is clear that Zampano despises the fool and eventually chases after him with a knife. The knife represents Zampanos physical approach to things and how he is viewed in terms of masculinity. The Fool continues messing with Zampano, until Zampano uni ntentionally kills him. His immediate thought it that his career is over and this shows just how physical he is and how he sees everything as what can it do for me? . He bought Gelsomina from her family, certainly not for her gain but for his own.This behavior also shows in the way he treats Rosa, he views women as things that are there to benefit him. He didnt realize his own strength and later says in the movie It was only two punches, two punches . Here hes clearly trying to justify the wrong he unknowingly committed. This isnt the only wrong. Towards the fetch up of the film Zampano leaves Gelsomina with some money and her trumpet and years later finds out that she died because he left her there. I believe that him leaving her was omen her death because there is no way she would know what to do, she didnt know how to survive without him.In Steinbecks Of Mice And Men, the main characters are the innocent simple-minded Lenny and his booster amplifier George, both(prenominal) of whom are very vigorous workingmen who travel around looking for physical labor that can be done. Lenny is mentally slow down and follows George standardised a puppy. George is often around animals, from the low mouse he was carrying in his pocket to the puppy he loved so much. In the beginning of the book George utilize to mess with Lenny because of his unwavering devotion but once he completed how genuine it was he stopped it immediately.George is described as a relatively strong man who is very smart and does the thinking for both him and Lenny. He watches out for Lenny and feels responsible for him. Lenny feels that his place is alship canal right next to George. However in the end of this book George abuses Lennys trust and murders him with the gun used to kill Candys dog around the time they arrived. He even killed him the same way that they killed the dog, one shot, right to the back of the head. I believe Steinbeck having the dog killed, foreshadows the death of Lenn y.Not just that he will die, but that someone who loves him will be the one to kill him. I think it shows that Lenny will die because he is always around animals, youre supposed to associate him with animals and pets, and that this dog isnt like most other dogs just like Lenny isnt like most other people. They both guard things working against them. For Lenny its being mentally retarded and for the dog it is the way that age has affected him. Both of these stories have a lot in common as far as archetypal symbol goes. They both have the child-like, innocent character represented by Gelsomina and Lenny.By having these characters in these pieces the audience is given someone to care about and feel devoted to. These two both act and are treated very much like children which makes it easy for us to see them in an innocent, positive light talent us someone to be interested in, we want to make sure they are okay and that nothing bad happens to them. There are many ways you can tell how innocent these characters are, both are shown with small animals a lot and Gelsomina is also shown in the same shot as the ocean a lot. These stories also have the physical male characters that very much affect the lives of the innocent characters.These physical characters would be George and Zampano, while these two characters themselves have very little in common as far as the time they lived and their profession their personal tales draw a surprising amount of parallels. These two are both protectors of the innocent characters, given the task to watch over them and are responsible for Lenny and Gelsomina. Both George and Zampano end up killing their innocent companion in the end. The deaths of Lenny and Gelsomina are both heavily foreshadowed. Zampano is very obvious with the fact that he doesnt care what happens to Gelsomina and like having to take care of her.So when he leaves her by the human face of the road its hard to be surprised because this was something you could see him doing to Gelsomina because he always treated her like a burden. However when George ends up killing Lenny it comes as a huge shock to the reader because he had always loved and protected him. Even though he didnt want to kill Lenny it was for the precaution of the people that Lenny interacted with so George felt he had to kill him. Both George and Zampano are very effected by the deaths of Lenny and Gelsomina.When they both realize what they have done, they return to the place where the story started. For Zampano and Gelsomina that is the ocean whereas for George and Lenny it is their own personal Eden in the woods. This is part of a reoccurring theme of cycles throughout these stories that are very important to the story. La Strada starts come to with a shot of Gelsomina by the ocean, something much like her. It goes with the flow and doesnt put up much resistance and is innocent and beautiful. At the end of the film, when Zampano has realized he is responsible for the death of Gelsomina he returns to the sea.The same is true for the beginning of Of Mice And Men, George and Lenny had just set up camp by a little river in the woods, a place where others had clearly been before. At the end of the book, Lenny was killed in that very spot after he ran away from the farm. These stories are both great examples of standard character archetypes and clearly show the heroes journey. Lenny and Gelsomina both clearly have a call to adventure, for Lenny it is going to work at a new farm with George and for Gelsomina it is when Zampano buys her from her family.They have their awakenings, Gelsominas is when the fool gives her the pebble and teaches her that everything has a purpose, Georges is when he crushes Curlys hand. They have their helpers, the Fool and all the other men on the farm. Their transformations are a little different, for George it would be when he kills Curlys wife and realizes he needs to run, for Gelsomina, though we dont see it, it is when she re alizes that she is alone and that Zampano has left her. live on of all is the return, unfortunately for our innocent characters this is tied into their deaths, and the actual killing/realization of their deaths.

Impact of London Hosting the 2012 Olympics

Impact of London Hosting the 2012 OlympicsLondon 2012s ambition is to create a Games for e very ane, w depict everyone is invited to take get, join in and enjoy the most exciting both the samet in the world ( www.london2012.com ). This is a laudable aim for those who are charged with the function for producing the Games in London. The aim of this study is to look at the potential mend of hosting the Games for Britain and how this glints the ideology of those who are running it.In order to assess the potential impact of the Games on Britain, one needs to investigate the success or otherwise of other major(ip) uncontaminating incidents that own been representd in the past. The most nonability or should I say nonorious failure in stipulations of the Olympics was the Montreal Games Henry Aubin, a Canadian wisespaper columnist commented that the Games had been a financial disaster. at that place has not been a single successful legacy of the Olympics (from Evening metre , Nov. 2006). The event itself was poorly organised from the start, with the result that it took the organisers thirty years to pay for the Games in their entirety this is something that Lord Coe and his team need to bear in mind.In more juvenile times, Olympic Games claim been run much more efficiently and imbibe left not and a financially confirmatory mark, but in any case left a legacy in terms of facilities and economic benefits which reflected not only the efforts but the ideology of those who were in charge. In Barcelona the quite a little of the metropolis and indeed the Spanish nation as a whole were involved in the project. The organisers realised that they needed the wholehearted support of the bulk, particularly the citizens of Barcelona. Their attention to detail was very impressive, even down to inviting comments to be made about road improvements in the lead going ahead with them to give the people a sense of ownership of the developments that were taking pla ce. The ideology that is being reflected here is that the Games are for everyone and that all force out have an active part in its ultimate success (or failure). The city already had a good deal that was peremptory about it before plans to hold the Games began, not least a hugely successful football team in Barcelona FC a big with their impressive stadium. The organisers highlighted the need for urban redevelopment to provide better facilities for the people in terms of magnetic declination, leisure, art, media, housing and transportation. Their other concern was to develop the tourist trade by improving the overall image of the city and the surrounding field of forces. It was straightforward that in that respect was a clear strategy for the post-event use of this area, which has subsequently become part of the citys tourist attractions and as much(prenominal), seems to have had a positive effect on the city (Roche 2000, P 145). The philosophy was clear from the outset the d esire to provide an excellent Games to reflect well on the city at the same time as providing benefits for the people of Barcelona in the long term through with(predicate) redevelopment and through tourism. The organising committee commented that the direct beneficiaries are the citizens of Barcelona whose surroundings have been immeasurably improved (Roche 2000, P 144). This statement is borne out by the physical improvements that were left in the city a refreshing waterfront and residential area, a new international airport, two new skyline communication towers, six new sports stadia (with another being extensively refurbished), a new museum of contemporary art, a remodelled Catalonian humanities museum and new media facilities. Roche (2000, P 144) concludes that the social policy aim was successfully achieved through, among other things, the new sports facilities, transport and housing built in a deprived city area.The aims of the organisers of the Manchester demesne games w ere along similar lines, to leave a lasting legacy of dissipated facilities and social, physical and economic regeneration (www.gameslegacy.co.uk). The ideology of the government and the local organisers was one of progressive development across a number of areas through sound investment, marketing, planning and implementation. The New East Manchester Partnership aimed to double the local population, to build new homes, to create a new town centre with a large area for retail provision, to create a business park and to construct a 100 million sports complex with a 48,000 capacity stadium. The amusecity complex includes the City of Manchester Stadium, the Regional Athletics Arena, the discipline Squash Centre, the National Cycling Centre, the Regional lawn tennis Centre, the English Institute of Sport and numerous hotels, bars, cafes, restaurants and a superstore. The benefits of this complex alone include 151 million investment in sports and leisure- a large amount of which was secured from Sport England (165 million split between facilities construction and the provision for the athletes themselves), local people being involved in building the venues, federation access guaranteed through targeted sessions at the venues, facilities being made available to local schools and clubs as well as people being trained as local sports coaches. The transformational impact of Sportcity, in particular in re-positioning East Manchester as an attractive area to invest, would not have been possible without the Games (Manchester City Council from www.gameslegacy.co.uk). Over the next fifteen years the area expects to attract in the region of 2 billion of investment from both the private and public sectors as a direct result of staging the Games and enable people to rediscover Manchester as both a business and tourist destination.Both of these events and the subsequent positive effects that have been seen and felt by the community and the nation have led there to be a dri ve to stage further large events either in the country or even in the cities themselves. These successful ventures have led to an increased desire for the feel good factor that is generated to be sought again. The communities in both Barcelona and Manchester fully back up the events that were being staged, which was evidenced by the huge demand for tickets for both Games. Hence both Spain and the United Kingdom have bid to host subsequent major events, with London securing the 2012 Olympic Games.The reasons behind the London bid for the Olympics are many. The bid began with the vision of the British Olympic Committee who felt that following the success of the Manchester Commonwealth games in terms of planning and eventual delivery, a credible case could be made for London to host the 2012 Games. The whitethornor of London and the government were back up to see the vision for the future of sport in the United Kingdom and strategies were developed and deployed around regeneration, l egacy, employment, tourism, new housing and health of the nation (www.olympics.org.uk). The ideology that is displayed here is one of community, encouraging the nation to take part in a global sporting event just for the event in itself but also for the improvement of the nation in a number of ways the kudos of running a global event would put the United Kingdom in the spotlight and potentially lead to foreign investment for the economic betterment of the country as a whole the opportunities for employment both pre and post Games the happen to enhance the lives of those in the East End of London through the provision of new housing and sports facilities as well as the regeneration of a very run down area of the capital the prospect to improve the health of the nation as a whole (particularly its children) through increased awareness of sporting opportunities provided across the country and through a better understanding of the need to eat a healthy diet. There is also the direct s porting legacy which depart exist as a result of the provision of world class facilities which can be accessed by both elite group athletes and the general public. The ideas could not solely be based on the sporting angle and had to be a multi-dimensional benefit package in order for the government to be automatic to underwrite the whole venture. A successful Games would bring untold benefits not only to the capital but the country as a whole Baroness Valentine eluded to this when she utter the 2012 Games offer a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to transform an exhilarating but rundown part of London and, most importantly, transform the lives of people who find themselves excluded from Londons booming economy (Evening Standard March, 2007).Those who were opposed to hosting the Games focused on the negative experiences of the cities who had made huge losses in the past and the fact that the direct benefits would only be felt by those in London and the surrounding area (with the not able exception of the sailing venue). Many highlighted the ideological vision of inclusion and opportunity for all as being undermined by the way that little consideration had apparently been given to hosting more of the events away from the capital and the financial effect that this event might have on the United Kingdom as a whole. Glyptis (1989) comments that when looking back on major events such as the Olympics, virtually all provision had been made on the basis of assumed need and assumed benefit which was rarely backed by evidence. Pete Wishat, Scottish Nationalist Member of parliament for North Tayside voiced concerns when he said I am strongly opposed to the UK taxpayer underwriting the entire cost, regardless of what that cost my finally be and particularly when there is a very real danger of the London bid soaking up lottery funding from Scotland and elsewhere in the UK (Daily Telegraph December, 2003). The experiences of the problems with the Millennium noodle also lo omed large in peoples minds with regard to the eventual use of the facilities that were proposed for the Olympic Park. They did not want to have a financial millstone around their neck. They also voiced their concerns over the legacy that would be left how could guarantees be given with regard to not only the facilities but also the sporting legacy for elite athletes and benefits to the nation as a whole through increased participation?Supporters of the event held a different and ultimately successful good deal increasingly sports events are part of a broader strategy aimed at raising the profile of a city and therefore success cannot be judged on entirely a profit and loss basis (Gratton, Henry, 2001 P 36). The National Heritage Committee (1995) stated that it is clear that bids to stage major sporting events can lease as a catalyst to stimulate economic regeneration even if they do not ultimately prove successful. They drew upon the experiences of the organisers of the Manche ster Commonwealth Games who were left with a superb legacy in terms of urban regeneration, better sporting facilities for all and increased employment opportunities. The Games are a shot in the gird for the UK economy at this difficult time, offering jobs on the Olympic Park for the previously unemployed and millions of pounds worth of contracts for UK businesses (John Armitt, www.london2012.com). The lasting effects of a venture such as this can be seen above through the experiences of Manchester following the hosting of the Commonwealth Games.The Western carry (2005) stated that while other nations boasted of their ability to run a smooth Games, Lord Coes team told the world how much it would mean to the future of this country and the Olympic movement if London was given the opportunity to stage the 2012 Games. Lord Coe continued the theme of legacy when he said were serious about inspiring young people because they allow for be stirred most directly by our Games (The Mirror J uly, 2005). There is also the feel good factor of improved mood and morale in the country which can never be underestimated, as was evidenced by the huge crowds for the parade held in London for the medallists from the Beijing Olympics even though they are not present at a sports event, millions may gain benefits of this nature from it (Gratton, Henry 2001 P 31). Many more can be reached as a result of the watch of the media and the blanket coverage that an event such as this receives and this has been a factor which has made sport far more important to all nations in recent years (Houlihan 1997). This has the effect of enhancing the market benefits to the cities (Gratton, Henry 2001 P 37) in terms of business investment and tourism and it also enables millions to be inspired by the efforts of others to put down in sport themselves.Overall the evidence that is available covering recent major sporting events would indicate that there will be a positive legacy for both London and t he UK as a whole in hosting this event, as the real value of the games comes from being associated with the Olympic image (Burbank Andranovich Heyling Rienner 2001 P1). The plans that have been drawn up for the urban redevelopment, the creation of employment opportunities, increased tourism as well as the benefits of increased participation in sport, alongside better facilities for the fostering of elite athletes should bring the legacy for which the organisers are hoping. They reflect the idea that there must be an investment in the future if there are to be long term benefits across a variety of areas for the benefit of the largest amount of people possible.The implications of hosting an event like the Olympics for elite athletes and the general public are enormous. The elite athletes need world class facilities in which to train and prepare for major events and more recently the government has sought to narrow the focus of sport policy, braggart(a) priority to a more limited r ange of sports and concentrating on youth/school sport and elite development (Houlihan 1997 P 46). This will have the three-fold effect of producing the elite athletes of the future, while providing for the people who are at the top of their chosen field now. This follows the idea that sport is for all and that all should be provided with the opportunity to fulfil their full potential. A glowing example of this effect is the success of the British Cycling team in the Beijing Olympics. Having been able to utilise the velodrome in Manchester (specifically constructed for the Commonwealth Games in 2002) as a training base and centre of excellence, their results in both the Olympics and the recent World Championships have been staggering. They not only reflect well on the government in terms of their investment but also in terms of the kudos that such results bring to the country as a whole. This in turn has brought a feel good factor to the cycling community, to the city of Manchester where the team is based and has had an effect on the amount of people who are enquiring about participating in cycling. The investment in elite athletes who achieve success can have a direct effect on the numbers of those who are wishing to become involved with any given sport. Another spin off from this is the training and subsequent employment of coaches within sport to nurture the talent that is emerging as a result of increased participation.Increased funding to train coaches also has the effect of helping sport at the grassroots level. The more coaches that are available, the more people can be involved in the enjoyment of their chosen performance as a part of the community community sporting capacity will be improved in a number of ways, such as training and development of volunteers, leadership and coaches (London 2012 Community Sports Legacy, www.sportengland,org.uk ). There is a chance to provide excluded groups with opportunities for participation and inclusion (Bradfo rd MDC 1997). There is also the opportunity to increase the emphasis that is being laid on sport in schools and for the youth of Britain, in order to foster the idea of a healthy lifestyle in terms of both physical activity and the way that people regard their health.Media coverage of the event will also have the effect of keeping sport in the public eye in a positive way, highlighting the benefits of a healthy lifestyle and encouraging people to become involved in sport. They have a responsibility to continually highlight the facilities that are available, how to be able to contact the national organising bodies for each sport in Britain and the benefits of becoming involved in sporting activity.The success of the Games will, in part, be measured by the increase in ordinary people taking exercise at new sports facilities (Evening Standard 2007). Only long term study will reveal the full extent of the effect of the Games on sport as there needs to be a sustained long term effect rat her than a flash in the pan.Clearly the UK government and the organisers of the London Games hope that the legacy of the Games will be twofold. Physically they will bequeath a redeveloped area in and around the Olympics site the Games are meant to deliver a more sporting nation (Evening Standard 2008). The former will be much easier to assess in the short term the latter will need to be looked at over the months and years following the Games.BibliographyBurbank, M Andranovich, G. D Heyling, C.H Rienner, L. 2001 Olympic DreamsThe Impact of Mega Events on Local Politics Boulder, CO Lynne RiennerGlyptis 1989 Leisure and Unemployment Milton Keynes OUPGratton, C Henry, I. 2001 Sport in The City The Role of Sport in Economic and Social Regeneration London RoutledgeHoulihan, B 1997 Sport, Policy and Politics A Comparative Analysis London RoutledgeRoche, M 2000 Mega-events and Modernity Olympics and Expos in The harvest-time of Global Culture New York RoutledgeBradford Metropolitan Distri ct Council Recreation Division 1997 A Strategy For Sport and Recreation A Framework and Guiding PrinciplesNational Heritage Committee 1995 Bids to Stage International Sporting Events Fifth Report House of Commons London HMSODaily Telegraph December 29, 2003 from www.telegraph.co.ukEvening Standard November 22, 2006 Monster Truck Races, Dilapidated stands and a Billion Dollar Debt that after 30 Years Will Finally Be Paid This Month The word of advice We in London Must All Heed From The Montreal OlympicsEvening Standard March 1, 2007 MPs and Peers Poised For Revolt over 2012 Raid on draught FundsEvening Standard May 15, 2007 The Councils Who Are Failing to Make London Fit for 2012 Games Boroughs Not Investing in FacilitiesEvening Standard May 15, 2008 The Real Legacy of The OlympicsThe Mirror July 7, 2005 London Olympics 2012 Our Golden Generation Lord Coe Winning The Games For London Can Bring Kids Back To SportWestern Mail July 7, 2005 Editorial Comment on Olympic Games Which Can Be A Winner For Us Allwww.gameslegacy.co.ukwww.london2012.comwww.olympics.org.ukwww.sportengland.org

Netflix Marketing Plan and SWOT Analysis

Netflix merchandise Plan and SWOT AnalysisBrand orCompany DescriptionNetflix is subscription service on the internet that offers a mixed bag ofTV shows and movies. Netflix is a forerunner in the internet delivery of TVshows and movies, launching its streaming service in 2007. Since this time, the ships company has developed a mature variety of internet-connected devices and haslicensed increasing amounts of matter that en competent consumers to enjoy theirfavorite TV shows and movies no matter where they be at because they nookieaccess this con ecstasyt on their TVs, computers or mobile devices. As a result ofthese efforts, Netflix has experienced growing consumer acceptance of andinterest in the delivery of TV shows and movies directly in all over the net profit(Netflix, 2018).Core Products or ServicesSubscribers piece of tail watch unlimited TV shows and movies instantly. Contentcan be streamed over the Internet to their TVs, computers and mobile devicesand, in the Unite d States, subscribers can also receive standard definitionDVDs, as well as Blu-ray discs, delivereddirectly to their homes. Netflixmarkets its service through various channels, including online advertising,broad-based media, such as television and radio, as well as various strategicfellowships. In addition to various marketing strategies, the company offersfree-trial memberships to new and rejoining members. According to Netflix,rejoining members are an principal(prenominal) source of subscriber additions (Netflix,2018).A BriefHistoryNetflix isan American entertainment company founded by Reed Hastings and MarcRandolphon August 29, 1997, in Scotts Valley, California. The company plumped into film in 2016 as well as television production and onlinedistribution. The company is head withdrawed in Los Gatos, California. As ofJanuary 2016, Netflix is operating in over one hundred ninety countries and has greatlyexpanded the production of both film and television series. Netflix released anestimated 126 original series or films in 2016, much than any other network orcable channel. As of January 2018, Netflix had 117.58 million payingsubscribers worldwide, including 54.75 million in the United States (Netflix,2018).Key flowingcompetitorsThe market for entertainment video is competitive and changes rapidly.Competitorshave the efficacy to launch new businesses at relatively lowcosts. Many consumers maintain subscriptions to multiple entertainment videoproviders at once and can easily remove from one provider to another. Netflixcompetitors include multichannel video programming distributors with free TV everywhereand video-on-demand content including cable providers, such as Time Warner andComcast. Direct mobilise satellite providers, such as DIRECTV and EchoStar, aswell as telecommunication providers such as AT&T and Verizon, are also keycompetitors for Netflix. Internet movie and TV content providers, such asApples iTunes, Amazon.com, Hulu.com and Googles YouTub e are also sources ofcompetition.DVD rental outlets such as blockbuster and Red-box also arealso included in the list of key competitors that Netflix faces (Netflix,2018).SWOTAnalysisSWOTAnalysis Strengths1.Brand NameAfter ten years, Netflix has fit the sole brand name for onlinestreaming content with a share price increase of over 6000% since 2007(Bradshaw& Bond, 2017). Often consumers are much more likely to gowith a brand name they know and trust than an off-brand that may or may not bea better mensurate for their money. This is one way Netflix can capitalize and growtheir business. Being the known familiar service provider puts them at agreater advant advance of not only keeping their customers but attaining new ones.2.Large customer base with serving 190 countries, Netflix has access to over 100 millionsubscribers. This saturation gives the company bargaining power when in talkswith studios to make exclusive content (Bradshaw& Bond, 2017).Thepopularity and convenience of Netflix is one of its greatest strengths. Thismakes them able to accommodate and appeal to a very large customer base and hasthe ability to further expand and develop in more areas, including partnershipsand expansions in various areas and with various companies in a variety ofcountries. Growth will likely continue as the company goes forward andcontinues to expand. Customers are opting for the convenience of consumingentertainment online and Netflix continues to expand internationally.3.Original contentThrough careful acquisitions, Netflix have secured numerous originalshows that have appealed to hearings. In 2017, two Netflix shows are sopopular they have pushed subscribers from 83m to over 100m in one quarter(Bradshaw & Bond, 2017). The House of card was a game changer for Netflix.All episodes of the first season of the show were released at the same time,and the response of the critics was overwhelmingly positive. The House of Cardsnot only deplumateed many new users but also proved that the key to their customersloyalty is a unique and abundant content library. The company continues toworks on adding new shows such as 30 kids shows, ten new feature films, 12documentaries, and ten stand-up comedy specials (Netflix, 2018).SWOTAnalysis Weaknesses1. cost of original contentWhile its original content creates a competitive advantage for thecompany, the cost continues to growin order tosupport this content.In 2017, it is judge for Netflix to invest $2.5 gazillionsolely onsecuring original content rights.To keep prices competitively low,Netflixwill lackto find a balance between maintaining goodrelationships with the distributors and aggressively negotiating contentlicensing costs with them. This type of dependence can result in avulnerability that could prove to be very costly (Bradshaw, 2017).2. omit of rights to original contentUnlike many traditional television studios, Netflix does not own most oftheir original programming. Due to this, rights usually e xpire after a year andthe original content can be shown on gibe services (Bradshaw, 2017). This isan area that serves as a potential weakness especially re young to retainingcustomers and keeping costs low.3.Environmental costNetflix has been ranked poorly in terms of environmental awareness. Thishas given them bad publicity for the company as rival competitors such as Amazonand Facebook use over 40% renewable energy with their services (Lewis, 2016).SWOTAnalysis Threats1.Increased competitionFacebook is the latest to give and take on traditional media by launchingits own original content. Amazon, Hulu, HBO, and YouTube are all competing foraudiences to subscribe to their platforms. For Netflix, this will continue todevelop as more companies seek to buy the latest original content exclusivelyfor their platform (Bradshaw, 2017).2.Digital PiracyFor more than 30 contentproviders, including Netflix, piracy has led to 5.4 billiondownloads ofmedia content in 2016 alone. This threatens Netflixs business model andability to fund content in the future (Opam, 2017). The ability for viewers toget the same content essentially for free is a huge potential threat forNetflixs bottom line and ability to continue to dominate the market.SWOTAnalysis Opportunities1.Expansion into chinawareDifficulties with licensing has left-hand(a) Netflix unable to enter Chinathrough traditional means. The company must find a joint-venture to capitalizeon the 500 millionChinese users who currently stream media content(Russell, 2017).2.Partnerships in EuropeTo meet new European laws, Netflix can partner with the BBC and CanalPlus to gain access to a wealth of native-language European content and growcustomers in local markets (Murgia & Bond, 2017).3.Growth of technologyWith the growth of streaming content, Netflix must continue to come upwith new ways to surrender customers to access their content and provide furthercompetitive advantages. A growing market for content is foreign-langua geprogramming. Partnerships with local-language content will help Netflix to beable to be a rival for local streaming services and help them to be a leaderamong this (Mintel, 2016).MarketingPlan FocusBased on my SWOT analysis, I believe there is an opportunity to expandinternationally by partnering with telecommunications companies such as Samsungto make the occupation readily available for customers on their devices inoverseas markets. For this marketing plan, Ive come up with an idea toincorporate the Netflix application into Android devices. This would target aparticular demographic, and could help to cause to solve the issues Netflixfaces internationally. The app would have early childhood development moviesand songs that would help little children and as well the already existing listof unending movie for all ages. SegmentationApproachFor this marketing plan, Ive opted for a straightforward demographicapproach to segmenting the market given my desire to target a specific ageg roup. I considered a behavioral approach based on past purchase history ascaptured via use of the McDonalds app. However, the app was only introduced inlate 2015 and age is not captured in the registration process (unless a socialmedia login is used). Furthermore, I dont want to limit my audience to justexisting customers. Given the broad appeal of the McDonalds concept and itsnational footprint, I did not feel geographic targeting or formal psychographictargeting was needed. stern DefinitionMy target for the Netflix K is families with young children andadolescents ranging from the age of 2 to 12 years old. An interest in learningand technology would allow for further media targeting. localizationStatementNetflix KA time for parents tohave calibre moments with their children while watching them learn, grow andexcel academically in the privacy and comfort of home.MarketingMix DiscussionMarketingMix ProductThis marketing plan is centered around education and the benefit offamilies com ing together and sharing quality moments with the thrill of oldfavorites and new exciting learning opportunities. The core idea is to useadvertisement to create awareness in between episodes and popups advertisementwhen the application is not in use or in between episodes when in use. With the already exiting approach of havingit available to Android devices it would help market itself by world readilyavailableMarketingMix PriceNetflix strategy would be to retain its already existing customer baseby offering 10% discounts on yearly subscriptions and 15% discount to customersthat have been a Netflix member for more than 3 years. Included in the pricenew series would be offered at a 50% off rate compared to its competitors suchas Hulu.com and Amazon Prime in order to be able to win and secure futurecustomers. This is characterized as skimming as they are trying to takebusiness from their competitors by offering the same service at a reduced rate.MarketingMix PromotionIn addition to t hepromotional pricing deal discussed above, there would be an opportunity toredeem a promotion encrypt to save money on a family night out package based onlocal available retailers. This would be a way for Netflix to partner withlocal companies in order to help them gain acceptance internationally.MarketingMix PlaceI would make use of adedicated Netflix K microsite where customers could go to learn more about thepromotion and app and to have the possibility to win promotion codes and saveadditional money on family nights out as well as the possibility of earningmonths free towards their Netflix subscription. This would also encourageadditional downloads of the Netflix K app and promotion of a larger and growingcustomer base. Potential achiever MetricsCustomer SatisfactionKnowing if people are actually satisfied with the service or product isvery important. Customer satisfaction can be a helpful metric in guidinga marketing campaign. Getting feedback directly from customer is an eas y way tomeasure satisfaction. nonpareil way to do this would be to add a standard Googleconsumer survey to the app or site for free. With a few simple questions, youcan find ifyour customers are satisfied with the app or site, what theydont like about the app or site, and whether or not they will continue usingthe app.User Engagement Tracking visits and signups isimportant, but management on how much time a user spends on your website or appis important as well. This has the ability to provide a realistic view and canbase future success around this friendship.ProgressIt is always important to keep moving forwardand having a forward momentum. If a company is qualification strong progress on a dayto day basis, then it will likely be creating new opportunities and growing thebusiness overall. This will allow the company to accomplish its overall goaland keep them on track. InternationalConsiderationsNetflix faces the challenge of being able to make their internationalsegment profit able. Netflix will need to invest in local content and betterstreaming quality over low bandwidth connections in order to attractsubscribers. Netflix will have to expand this base quickly in order to be ableto recover the associated costs. Netflix will also have to consider thecompetition of other providers such as Amazon and YouTube who are also lookingto capture this segment of the market. Another challenge Netflix faces relatedto international markets such as India, is lower internet insight andexisting connections with low bandwidth. These factors limit its targetconsumers in these countries to the small section of the population that haveaccess to high speed internet. Viewing preferences is another considerationthat will have to be addressed as these differ from country to country and evenbetween different regions of the same country. In order to attract subscribers,Netflix needs to have a broad content library catering to the preferences ofthe diverse audience (Bradshaw & Bon d, 2017).ConclusionThe Netflix K marketing plan should be okay for funding because ithas the opportunity to generate a great deal of business and success inentering many foreign markets not previously entered in. Associating Netflixwith current technology such as Samsung and then appealing to a customer baseof families with children has the possibility of building a strong businessbase in this target population and areas abroad. This will also help buildaffinity and rapport with local businesses in foreign destinations helpingNetflix to become a cover song international company not just a top American company. ReferencesBradshaw, T. (2017)Netflix boosted as viewers outside the US tune in.Financial Times.Retrieved fromhttps//www.ft.com/content/e8c742f2-6b34-11e7-b9c7-15af748b60d0.Bradshaw, T., and Bond,S. (2017). Netflix looks to become worlds entertainer as it hits milestone.Financial Times.Retrievedfromhttps//www.ft.com/content/06b55bb8-6d0c-11e7-bfeb-33fe0c5b7eaa.Lewis, D. (201 6). Will the internet of things sacrifice or save the environment?Guardian Business.Retrieved from https//www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2016/dec/12/will-the-internet-of- things-sacrifice-or-save-the-environment. Mintel, J.(2016).Music and Video Streaming-UK-April 2016.Mintel Academic.Retrieved fromhttp//academic.mintel.com/ divulge/770307/.Murgia, M., and Bond, D. (2017). Netflix seeks European crown in local content push.Financial Times.Retrieved from https//www.ft.com/content/c286c25e-04d5-11e7-aa5b-6bb07f5c8e12. Netflix Inc. businessdescription. (2018).CSIMarket.com.Retrieved fromhttps//csimarket.com/stocks/NFLX-Business-Description.html.Opam, K. (2017). HBO,Netflix, other Hollywood companies join forces to fight piracy.TheVerge.Retreived fromhttps//www.theverge.com/2017/6/13/15791688/hbo-netflix-hollywood-ace-fight-piracy.Russell, J. (2017).Netflix enters China via licensing deal with top video streaming serviceiQiyi.Tech Crunch.Retrieved fromhttps//techcrunch.com/ 2017/04/25/netflix-china-iqiyi/.

Franklin Roosevelt :: essays research papers

Franklin Roosevelt was 32nd president of the US 1933-45, a Democrat. He served as regulator of New York 1929-33. suitable president during the Great Depression, he launched the New Deal economic and social reform program, which made him popular with the people. After the outbreak of area War II he introduced lend-lease for the supply of warfare materials and services to the Allies and drew up the Atlantic Charter of solidarity. Once the US had entered the war 1941, he exhausted much time in meetings with Allied leaders. Born in Hyde Park, New York, of a wealthy family, Roosevelt was educated in Europe and at Harvard and Columbia universities, and became a lawyer. In 1910 he was elected to the New York state senate. He held the assistant secretaryship of the dark blue in Wilson&8217s administrations 1913-21, and did much to growth the efficiency of the navy during World War I. He suffered from polio from 1921 but returned to politics, winning the governorship of New York Stat e in 1929. When he first became president 1933, Roosevelt inculcated a new feel of hope by his skillful "fireside chats" on the radio and his inaugural-address statement "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." environ himself by a "Brain Trust" of experts, he immediately launched his reform program. Banks were reopened, federal credit was restored, the gold standard was abandoned, and the dollar devalued. During the first hundred eld of his administration, major order to facilitate industrial and agricultural recovery was enacted. In 1935 he introduced the Utilities Act, directed against abuses in the large holding companies, and the Social Security Act, providing for handicap and retirement insurance. The presidential election 1936 was won entirely on the record of the New Deal. During 1935-36 Roosevelt was involved in a conflict over the composition of the sovereign Court, following its nullification of major New Deal measures as unconstituti onal. In 1938 he introduced measures for farm relief and the improvement of working conditions. . In spite of absolute isolationist opposition, he broke a long-standing precedent in running for a third term he was reelected 1940. Franklin Roosevelt was a well like manhood by close all of the country. He was even considered by many as a god. Much of this was in his charisma that he had, but he also encircled himself with bright, intelligent people. Here is a listing of the members of the cabinet who were under RooseveltFranklin Roosevelt essays research papers Franklin Roosevelt was 32nd president of the US 1933-45, a Democrat. He served as governor of New York 1929-33. Becoming president during the Great Depression, he launched the New Deal economic and social reform program, which made him popular with the people. After the outbreak of World War II he introduced lend-lease for the supply of war materials and services to the Allies and drew up the Atlantic Charter of solidarit y. Once the US had entered the war 1941, he spent much time in meetings with Allied leaders. Born in Hyde Park, New York, of a wealthy family, Roosevelt was educated in Europe and at Harvard and Columbia universities, and became a lawyer. In 1910 he was elected to the New York state senate. He held the assistant secretaryship of the navy in Wilson&8217s administrations 1913-21, and did much to increase the efficiency of the navy during World War I. He suffered from polio from 1921 but returned to politics, winning the governorship of New York State in 1929. When he first became president 1933, Roosevelt inculcated a new spirit of hope by his skillful "fireside chats" on the radio and his inaugural-address statement "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." Surrounding himself by a "Brain Trust" of experts, he immediately launched his reform program. Banks were reopened, federal credit was restored, the gold standard was abandoned, and the dollar dev alued. During the first hundred days of his administration, major legislation to facilitate industrial and agricultural recovery was enacted. In 1935 he introduced the Utilities Act, directed against abuses in the large holding companies, and the Social Security Act, providing for disability and retirement insurance. The presidential election 1936 was won entirely on the record of the New Deal. During 1935-36 Roosevelt was involved in a conflict over the composition of the Supreme Court, following its nullification of major New Deal measures as unconstitutional. In 1938 he introduced measures for farm relief and the improvement of working conditions. . In spite of strong isolationist opposition, he broke a long-standing precedent in running for a third term he was reelected 1940. Franklin Roosevelt was a well like man by almost all of the country. He was even considered by many as a god. Much of this was in his charisma that he had, but he also surrounded himself with bright, intell igent people. Here is a listing of the members of the cabinet who were under Roosevelt

Traffick :: essays papers

Traffick This saga of the so-called war on drugs is a masterwork of superb performance, smart writing--and, most of all, the mark of a director who not only knows what he wants, but also exactly how to make his ambitious vision a glorious reality. Unlike most multicharacter pastiches, such(prenominal) as the ones made by Robert Altman, or Paul Thomas Andersons Magnolia, the characters of Traffics three tales dont constantly crisscross, nor be they all brought together by a big event. Intersections are rare in Traffic, and the junctions that do occur are often fleeting. Yet the stories are strongly linked by their greater thematic concern to vividly illustrate how the drug problem touches all corners of the country, all walks of life, from people on the harsh urban streets to those in lavish upper-class neighborhoods. Soderbergh and writer Stephen Gaghan, working from the 80s British miniseries Traffik, steadfastly refuse to force easy, comforting conclusions from difficult and c omplex situations as in real life, one is left to decide for oneself who or what is right, and what it all means. small-arm Traffic is essentially about the war on drugs in America, the pips starting point is the almost-exclusively south-of-the-border (and nearly-completely Spanish-language) story of Javier Rodriguez (Benicio Del Toro, doing away with his annoying tics and delivering a career performance), an average Tijuana convey policeman who is given the opportunity for greater prestige by working for General Salazars (Tomas Milian) efforts against the drug cartels. Just north of the border in San Diego is the setting for other thread, in which very pregnant European migr Helena Ayala (Catherine Zeta-Jones, her real-life condition adding a deeper layer to her role) learns that the pampered lifestyle provided by husband Carlos (Steven Bauer) comes from dabblings in drugs, not legit business ventures. The film also travels a bit northwest to Cincinnati, the third central locale, where Caroline (Erika Christensen), the teenage daughter of newly-appointed U.S. drug czar Robert Wakefield (Michael Douglas), brings her fathers enemy much closer to nucleotide than he could have ever imagined. Soderbergh effortlessly weaves the individual strands into a tapestry that is at once cohesive and characterized by its contrasting colors. The latter can be taken in a literal sense--Soderbergh, under the pseudonym Peter Andrews (his fathers name), shot the film himself, and he gave each part of the film its own distinguishable look grainy, washed-out yellow for Mexico a solemn blue sheen for Cincinnati sun-drenched full color for San Diego.